Andy Satyakusuma

welcome to our blog

About Andy

ASIA AFRICA FOUNDATION
Finance and Foreign Affair Director
Indonesia

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT ORGANIZATION
Goodwill Ambassador

IMPACTIVITY UK LTD
Director
London, United Kingdom

MY GLOBAL FUND - THE GLOBAL FUND
Fight against the world's three deadliest pandemics: HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.
Country Coordinating Mechanism
The Country Coordinating Mechanism is a
country-level partnership of stakeholders from
nongovernmental organizations, multilateral and
bilateral agencies, the public and private sectors,
and people living with or affected by the diseases.
It is responsible for submitting proposals to the
Global Fund, nominating the grantee(s) or Principal
Recipient(s) and providing oversight to grant
implementation.

Total Pageviews

Blog Archive

Download

FOREX RATES live

Radio

Posts

Comments

The Team

Blog Journalist

Connect With Us

Join To Connect With Us

Portfolio


  • HATI adalah organ paling utama dalam tubuh manusia dan nikmat paling agung diberikan Allah sebagai titik untuk menilai keikhlasan. Di hati lahirnya niat yang menjadi penentu sesuatu amalan diterima sebagai pahala atau sebaliknya.

    Hati perlu dijaga dan dipelihara dengan baik supaya tidak rusak, sakit, buta, keras dan tidak mati bagi mengelak penyakit masyarakat yang berpunca daripada hati.
    Kerusakan pada hati membawa kepada kerusakan seluruh nilai hidup pada diri seseorang individu. Penyakit hati yang menyerang kebanyakan kita ialah penyakit fitnah, sama ada menjadi penyebar atau mudah mempercayai fitnah.

    Perbuatan fitnah adalah sebahagian perbuatan mengadu-domba yang mudah menyebabkan permusuhan dua pihak yang dikaitkan dengan fitnah berkenaan.

    Masyarakat yang dipenuhi budaya fitnah akan hidup dalam keadaan gawat. Sebelah pihak sibuk menyebarkan fitnah dan sebelah pihak lagi terpaksa berusaha menangkis fitnah itu, akibat perbuatan itu boleh mencetus persengketaan dan mungkin berakhir dengan tragedi kerugian harta benda dan nyawa. Individu yang suka menyebar fitnah sentiasa mencari kejadian atau berita boleh dijadikan bahan fitnah. 

    Allah memberi peringatan mengenai Fitnah dalam surat Albaqarah ayat 191 :

     وَاقْتُلُوهُمْ حَيْثُ ثَقِفْتُمُوهُمْ وَأَخْرِجُوهُمْ مِنْ حَيْثُ أَخْرَجُوكُمْ وَالْفِتْنَةُ أَشَدُّ مِنَ الْقَتْلِ وَلَا تُقَاتِلُوهُمْ عِنْدَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ حَتَّى يُقَاتِلُوكُمْ فِيهِ فَإِنْ قَاتَلُوكُمْ فَاقْتُلُوهُمْ كَذَلِكَ جَزَاءُ الْكَافِرِينَ

    Dan bunuhlah mereka di mana saja kamu jumpai mereka, dan usirlah mereka dari tempat mereka telah mengusir kamu (Mekah); dan fitnah itu lebih besar bahayanya dari pembunuhan, dan janganlah kamu memerangi mereka di Masjidilharam, kecuali jika mereka memerangi kamu di tempat itu. Jika mereka memerangi kamu (di tempat itu), maka bunuhlah mereka. Demikianlah balasan bagi orang-orang kafir.

    Semua berita diterima perlu dipastikan kebenarannya. Kebijaksanaan dan kewarasan fikiran amat penting digunakan bagi memastikan tidak terpedaya dengan berita berunsur fitnah.

    Firman Allah mengatakan: 
    ( يَـأيُّهَاالّذِيْن آمنـُوْا ِاٍنْ جـآءَكمْ فَاسقٌ بـِنَباٍ فتبيّنـُوْا أنْ تُصِبـوْا قوْمًـا بِجَهَالـةٍ فتُصْبِحُـوْا علَى مَا فعَلْتـُمْ نـدميـن )
     “Wahai orang-orang yang beriman, jika datang seorang yang fasik kepadamu membawa berita, maka tangguhkanlah (hingga kamu mengetahui kebenarannya) agar tidak menyebabkan kaum berada dalam kebodohan (kehancuran) sehingga kamu menyesal terhadap apa yang kamu lakukan” QS. Al-Hujurat : 09

    Banyak pihak yang turut terbabit menyebar fitnah sebenarnya tidak mempunyai kepentingan berkaitannya. Tetapi, disebabkan amalan menyebar fitnah sudah menjadi kebiasaan, banyak yang turut menyertainya dan seperti mendapat kepuasan daripada perbuatan itu.
    Fitnah biasanya disebarkan bertujuan memburukkan individu atau kumpulan. Pada masa sama, perbuatan itu dapat menonjolkan dirinya sebagai lebih baik dan lebih layak berbanding orang yang diburukkan itu. Dalam Islam, sesuatu berita benar tetap tidak boleh disebarkan jika orang yang berkaitan cerita itu tidak mau disebarkan kepada orang lain. Menyebarkan berita benar tetap dilarang, apalagi  menyebarkan berita tidak benar.

    Perkara pertama perlu diberi perhatian untuk memastikan kebenaran berita ialah memastikan sumber berita itu, yakni siapakah yang mula menyebarkan berita dan rantaian orang yang membawa berita itu.
    Obat bagi penyakit hati ialah dengan memperbanyakkan taubat dan selalu berzikir.

    ANDY SATYAKUSUMA

  • The poverty rate in Indonesia is still very high by statistical center in Indonesia The number of poor people in Indonesia in March 2012 reached 29.13 million (11.96 percent), reduced by 0.89 million people (0.53 percent) compared to the poor in March 2011 which amounted to 30.02 million (12.49 percent). During the period March 2011-March 2012, the poor in urban areas is reduced by approximately 399.5 thousand people (from 11.05 million in March 2011 to 10.65 million in March 2012), while in rural areas decreased 487 thousand people (from 18.97 million in March 2011 to 18.48 million in March 2012). The percentage of poor people in urban areas in March 2011 amounted to 9.23 percent, dropping to 8.78 percent in March 2012. Likewise with the poor in rural areas, from 15.72 percent in March 2011 to 15.12 percent in March 2012. The role of food commodities to the poverty line is significantly greater than the role of non-food commodities (housing, clothing, education, and health). In March 2012, donations to the Food Poverty Line Poverty Line by 73.50 per cent, not much different from that in March 2011 at 73.52 persen.Komoditi food greatly affect the value of the urban poverty line is rice, cigarette filters, egg race, sugar, chicken, tempeh, tofu, noodles, onion, and red pepper. Meanwhile, commodities that will greatly affect the value of the Poverty Line in rural areas are rice, filter cigarettes, sugar, eggs, instant noodles, tempeh, onion, tofu, in addition to coffee and cayenne pepper.

    Poverty reduction in Indonesia can not occur significantly in because of several factors among others due to the high inflation rate in the community, leading to high staple and lower purchasing power of the people. The decline in poverty is happening with a growth rate above 6 percent during 2010 to mid-2012. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the poor perceived inflation is still high. It can be seen from the poverty basket inflation of 10.9 percent in 2011, and 6.52 percent, which is a provisional figure, in 2012. The percentage decreased only thin. "Even in 2005, despite the growth, but poverty basket inflation recorded up to 12.87 percent because of rising fuel prices, the impact on the increase in the poverty rate, from 15.97 percent to 17.75 percent in 2006.

    Another thing that is not the cause of the poverty reduction in Indonesia is caused by rising unemployment in Indonesia. Total labor force in Indonesia in August 2012 reached 118.0 million, decreased by about 2.4 million people compared to the labor force of 120.4 million people Februari2012 or increased by about 670 thousand people compared to August 2011.Jumlah residents working in Indonesia in August 2012 reached 110.8 million, decreased by about 2.0 million people compared to the state in February 2012 amounted to 112.8 million or an increase of 1.1 million people compared to the state in August 2011. Unemployment rate (TPT) in Indonesia in August 2012 reached 6.14 percent, lower than in February 2012 amounted to 6.32 TPT

    During the last year (August 2011-August 2012), the number of people working has increased, especially in the industrial sector sekitar830 thousand (5.71 percent), and Social Services Sector of 450 thousand people (2.70 percent). While the sectors are declining agricultural sector amounted to 450 thousand people (1.14 percent), Trade Sector by 250 thousand people (1.07 percent), and the Transport Sector, Warehousing, and Komunikasisebesar 80 thousand people (1.57 per cent ).
    Based on the number of hours worked in August 2012, amounting to 76.5 million people (69.04 percent) to work over 35 hours per week, while residents to the number of hours worked less than 15 hours per week at 6.6 million (5.98 percent ). In August 2012, the work on the elementary school education still dominates in the amount of 53.9 million people (48.63 percent), while the working population with education diploma approximately 3.0 million people (2.68 per cent) and people working with university education is only of 7.0 million (6.30 percent).
    Looking at the above, the Government should work more seriously in the face of poverty in Indonesia, and not just concentrate on the problem of political feuding and corruption cases. tackle the problem of corruption let remain a realm of law and politics as a means of exploitation that is currently perceived by the public. Leaders in Indonesia each other down to get busy political position for personal or group interests them.
    Development projects that can be felt directly benefits should be implemented by the government , such as the provision of  energy-efficient power plant (low energy power), so will lower the basic rate electricity prices, the decline in electricity prices will make affect to the cost of industrial sectors and price freight transportation, things like this will automatically lower the base price of basic commodities in Indonesia and increasing the purchasing power of the people in the area. Export policies  also need to be improved. in the real sector or banking should be more simplified procedures for working capital loans to export-oriented business filed, with the provision of working capital to the soft floral craftsmen that produce export commodities. Guidance for export-oriented businesses should be improved, it is to encourage the country's foreign exchange earnings which will be used to build the country.




  • Angka kemiskinan di Indonesia masih sangat tinggi berdasarkan pusat statistik di Indonesia Jumlah penduduk miskin di Indonesia pada Maret 2012 mencapai 29,13 juta orang (11,96 persen), berkurang 0,89 juta orang (0,53 persen) dibandingkan dengan penduduk miskin pada Maret 2011 yang sebesar 30,02 juta orang (12,49 persen).  Selama periode Maret 2011−Maret 2012, penduduk miskin di daerah perkotaan berkurang sekitar 399,5 ribu orang (dari 11,05 juta orang pada Maret 2011 menjadi 10,65 juta orang pada Maret 2012), sementara di daerah perdesaan berkurang 487 ribu orang (dari 18,97 juta orang pada Maret 2011 menjadi 18,48 juta orang pada Maret 2012). Persentase penduduk miskin di daerah perkotaan pada Maret 2011 sebesar 9,23 persen, menurun menjadi 8,78 persen pada Maret 2012. Begitu juga dengan penduduk miskin di daerah perdesaan, yaitu dari 15,72 persen pada Maret 2011 menjadi 15,12 persen pada Maret 2012. Peranan komoditi makanan terhadap Garis Kemiskinan jauh lebih besar dibandingkan peranan komoditi bukan makanan (perumahan, sandang, pendidikan, dan kesehatan). Pada Maret 2012, sumbangan Garis Kemiskinan Makanan terhadap Garis Kemiskinan sebesar 73,50 persen, tidak jauh berbeda dengan Maret 2011 yang sebesar 73,52 persen.Komoditi makanan yang berpengaruh besar terhadap nilai Garis Kemiskinan di perkotaan adalah beras, rokok kretek filter, telur ayam ras, gula pasir, daging ayam ras, tempe, tahu, mie instan, bawang merah, dan cabe merah. Sedangkan, komoditi yang berpengaruh besar terhadap nilai Garis Kemiskinan di perdesaan adalah beras, rokok kretek filter, gula pasir, telur ayam ras, mie instan, tempe, bawang merah, tahu, dengan tambahan kopi dan cabe rawit. 

    Penurunan angka kemiskinan di Indonesia tidak dapat terjadi significant di karenakan beberapa faktor diantara lain dikarenakan tingginya angka inflasi di masyarakat, yang menyebabkan tingginya  bahan pokok dan menurunkan tingkat daya beli dari masyarakat. Penurunan angka kemiskinan tersebut terjadi dengan tingkat pertumbuhan di atas 6 persen selama tahun 2010 hingga pertengahan 2012. Sekalipun demikian, inflasi yang dirasakan masyarakat miskin masih tinggi. Hal ini bisa dilihat dari poverty basket inflation sebesar 10,9 persen pada 2011, dan 6,52 persen, yang merupakan angka sementara, pada 2012. Persentase hanya berkurang tipis. "Bahkan pada 2005, walaupun terjadi pertumbuhan, tapi poverty basket inflation tercatat sampai 12,87 persen karena ada kenaikan harga BBM, berdampak pada kenaikan angka kemiskinan, dari 15,97 persen menjadi 17,75 persen pada 2006.

    Hal lain yang menjadi penyebab dari tidak terjadinya angka kemiskinan di Indonesia adalah disebabkan oleh meningkatnya angka pengangguran di Indonesia. Jumlah angkatan kerja di Indonesia pada Agustus 2012 mencapai 118,0 juta orang, berkurang sekitar 2,4 juta orang dibanding angkatan kerja Februari2012 sebesar 120,4 juta orang atau bertambah sekitar 670 ribu orang dibanding Agustus 2011.Jumlah penduduk yang bekerja di Indonesia pada Agustus 2012 mencapai 110,8 juta orang, berkurang sekitar 2,0 juta orang dibanding keadaan pada Februari 2012 sebesar 112,8 juta orang atau bertambah 1,1 juta orang dibanding keadaan Agustus 2011. Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka (TPT) di Indonesia pada Agustus 2012 mencapai 6,14 persen, mengalami penurunan dibanding TPT Februari 2012 sebesar 6,32 persen dan TPT Agustus 2011 sebesar 6,56 persen.Selama setahun terakhir (Agustus 2011―Agustus 2012), jumlah penduduk yang bekerja mengalami kenaikan terutama di Sektor Industri sekitar830 ribu orang (5,71 persen), serta Sektor Jasa Kemasyarakatan sebesar 450 ribu orang (2,70 persen). Sedangkan sektor-sektor yang mengalami penurunan adalah Sektor Pertanian sebesar 450 ribu orang (1,14 persen), Sektor Perdagangan sebesar 250 ribu orang (1,07 persen), dan Sektor Transportasi, Pergudangan, dan Komunikasisebesar 80 ribu orang (1,57 persen).

    Berdasarkan jumlah jam kerja pada Agustus 2012, sebesar 76,5 juta orang (69,04 persen) bekerja diatas 35 jam per minggu, sedangkan penduduk bekerja dengan jumlah jam kerja kurang dari 15 jam perminggu mencapai 6,6 juta orang (5,98 persen). Pada Agustus 2012, penduduk bekerja pada jenjang pendidikan SD ke bawah masih tetap mendominasi yaitu sebesar 53,9 juta orang (48,63persen), sedangkan penduduk bekerja dengan pendidikan diploma sekitar 3,0 juta orang (2,68 persen) dan penduduk bekerja dengan pendidikan universitas hanya sebesar 7,0 juta orang (6,30persen). 

    Melihat keadaan tersebut diatas, Pemerintah harus bekerja lebih serius dalam menghadapi kemiskinan di Indonesia, dan tidak hanya berkonsentrasi kepada masalah perseteruan politik dan kasus-kasus korupsi. penanggulangan masalah korupsi biarkanlah tetap menjadi ranah hukum dan tidak menjadi sarana ekploitasi politik seperti yang saat ini dirasakan oleh masyarakat. Para pemimpin di Indonesia sibuk saling menjatuhkan untuk mendapatkan posisi politik bagi kepentingan pribadi ataupun golongan mereka. 

    Pembangunan proyek-proyek yang dapat dirasakan langsung manfaatnya oleh masyarakat harus segera dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah, seperti contohnya penyediaan sarana pembangkit tenaga listrik yang hemat energy (low energy power), sehingga dapat menurunkan tarif dasar harga listrik, dengan turunnya tarif dasar listrik  secara hukum kausal akan  berdampak kepada sektor-sektor industri dan harga angkutan transportasi, hal seperti ini automatis akan menurunkan harga dasar bahan pokok sehingga meningkatkan kemampuan daya beli masyarakat.Kebijakan ekonomi di bidang eksport juga diperbaiki. di sektor riil atau perbankan harus lebih mempermudah prosedur pemberian kredit modal kerja kepada bidang-bidang usaha yang berorientasi eksport, pemberian modal kerja dengan bunga lunak kepada para pengrajin kecil yang menghasilkan komoditas eksport. Pembinaan terhadap  pengusaha berorientasi eksport harus perlu ditingkatkan, hal ini untuk mendorong pendapatan devisa negara yang akan dipergunakan untuk membangun Negara.











  • Department of Economic and Social Affairs
    Division for Public Administration and Development Management
    Innovations in
    Public Governance

    Genesis, Purpose and Scope of the United Nations Public Service Awards
    This chapter provides an overview of the rationale for establishing the United Nations Public Service Awards, and it outlines the objectives, the categories and criteria of its annual competition, and its selection process.
    1. What is the United Nations Public Service Awards Programme?
    The United Nations Public Service Awards Programme is the most prestigious international recognition of excellence in public service. It rewards the creative achievements and contributions of public service institutions to a more effective and responsive public administration in countries worldwide. Through an annual competition, the United Nations Public Service Awards Programme promotes the role, professionalism and visibility of public service. It encourages exemplary public service and recognizes that democracy and successful governance are built on a competent civil service.
    2. Why was the United Nations Public Service Awards Programme Established?
    Governments from around the world are required to respond to increasingly complex demands from their citizens and significant changes in their global environments. At the national level, they are grappling with several difficult social and economic issues; including poverty eradication, unemployment, poor education systems; health epidemics (including HIV/AIDS and the avian influenza), and environmental degradation. At the same time, they are attempting to readjust their policies and skills to integrate effectively into the world economy. 
    Overall, governments face three main challenges:
    • First, they must operate and provide more far-reaching and higher-quality services with reduced resources and limited operational capacities. That is to say, governments must use their resources and build capacities not only more effectively but also more creatively by, for example, enlisting the support of the private sector and civil society in service delivery. 
    • Second, they must make public institutions more accountable, responsive, and effective by promoting a more citizen-oriented public administration. 
    • Third, and most importantly, they must respond more adequately to citizens’ demands for greater participation. 
    Although government still plays a central role in society, it is now widely recognized that civil society and the private sector also have an important role to play in this sphere. Citizens no longer perceive themselves as passive “consumers” of government services but as part of the solution to handle emerging issues more effectively. Deepening democracy to provide opportunities not only for improved representation but also for more active participation and engagement in public affairs requires innovative institutional mechanisms, processes, and policies. 
    As a consequence, several countries around the world are attempting to revitalize their public administration and make it more proactive, more efficient, more accountable, and especially more service oriented. To accomplish this transformation, governments are introducing innovations in their organisational structure, practices, capacities, and working on how to mobilize, deploy, and utilize the human, material, information, technological, and financial resources for service delivery to remote, disadvantaged, and challenged people.
    While there are efforts all over the world to find innovative ways to improve the performance of public administration and to empower it to effectively initiate, plan and implement national development policies and programmes as well as international and regional agreed development strategies, including the Millennium Development Goals; there is, also, a strong need to acknowledge and share them at the international level. 
    In light of the above, the United Nations Public Service Awards Programme was launched to promote and support Member States’ efforts to improve public sector performance. The importance of this international recognition has later been recalled in 2005, when the United Nations General Assembly “agreed that the United Nations should promote innovation in government and public administration and stressed the importance of making more effective use of United Nations Public Service Day and the United Nations Public Service Awards in the process of revitalizing public administration by building a culture of innovation, partnership, and responsiveness” (UN/2005, A/60/L.24, para.7). To capitalize on existing knowledge on how to achieve development and the Millennium Development Goals, the United Nations General Assembly in 2003 also recommended in Resolution 57/277 that the exchange of experiences related to the role of public administration in the implementation of internationally agreed goals, including those contained in the Millennium Declaration, be encouraged (United Nations, 2003, A/RES/57/277). 
    3. When and How was the UNPSA Established?
    The United Nations Public Service Awards Programme was launched as a result of the deliberations of the fifteenth meeting of the Group of Experts on the United Nations Programme in Public Administration and Finance (GA Resolution 49/136). During this session, the Group of Experts recommended that an annual event be organized by the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat through its Division for Public Economics and Public Administration (now the Division for Public Administration and Development Management) to recognize and encourage excellence in public administration. This recommendation was subsequently reflected in the report of the Secretary-General on the work of the Group of Experts on the United Nation Programme in Public Administration and Finance at its fifteenth meeting (E/2000/66) and endorsed by the Economic and Social Council in its decision 2000/231 of 27 July 2000.
    As reiterated by the General Assembly in its resolution 57/277 in 2003, “efficient accountable and transparent public administration, at both the national and international levels, has a key role to play in the implementation of internationally agreed goals, including those contained in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, and in that context stresses the need to strengthen national public sector administrative and managerial capacity-building, in particular in developing countries and countries with economies in transition.”
    Therefore, in line with the above, 23 June has been designated the United Nations Public Service Day to “celebrate the value and virtue of service to the community.” The Economic and Social Council established the United Nations Public Service Awards to be bestowed on the Public Service Day for contributions made to the cause of enhancing the role, prestige and visibility of public service.”
    4. What is the Overall Purpose of UNPSA?
    The overall purpose of the United Nations Public Awards is to recognize the institutional contribution made by public servants to enhance the role, professionalism and visibility of the public service (Economic and Social Council decision 2000/231). It can be translated into the more specific following objectives:
    • To reward service to citizens and motivate public servants worldwide to sustain the momentum of innovation and the improvement of the delivery of public services;
    • To collect and disseminate successful practices and experiences in public administration in order to support efforts for improvements in country level public service delivery;
    • Through success stories to counterbalance any negative image of public administration, raise the image and prestige of public servants and revitalize public administration as a noble discipline, on which development greatly depends; and
    • To enhance professionalism in the public service by rewarding the successful experiences in innovations and excellence in the public service.
    In brief, the Awards aim to:
    • Discover innovations in governance;
    • Reward excellence in the public sector;
    • Motivate public servants to further promote innovation;
    • Enhance professionalism in the public service;
    • Raise the image of public service;
    • Enhance trust in government; and
    • Collect and disseminate successful practices for possible replication.

    5. Who Manages the UNPSA Programme?
    The Programme is managed by the Division for Public Administration and Development Management of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
    6. What are the Eligibility Criteria?
    All Public organisations/agencies at national and sub-national levels, as well as public/private partnerships and organisations performing outsourced public service functions, are eligible for nomination. The United Nations Public Service Awards Programme takes into consideration a geographical distribution of five regions. In order to level the playing field for nominations received from countries with varying levels of development and income, the following five regions have been established:
    • Africa;
    • Asia and the Pacific;
    • Europe and North America;
    • Latin America and the Caribbean; and
    • Western Asia.
    Nominations have to be made by another entity than the institution being nominated, i.e., self nominations will not be accepted. Eligible nominators include: government departments and agencies; universities, non-governmental organisations, professional associations, etc. Purely scientific innovations, e.g., in medical or environmental science, do not qualify for the United Nations Public Service Awards.

    7. What are the Categories and Criteria for Selection?
    The UNPSA categories and criteria for selection are hereafter described by year. 
    2003 Categories:
    1. Improvement of Public Service Results
    2. Improvement of the Quality of the Public Service Process
    3. Initiatives in the Public Service
    2004 Categories:
    1. Improvement of Public Service Results
    2. Improvement of the Quality of the Public Service Process
    3. Initiatives in the Public Service
    4. Application of Information and Communication Technology in Local Government
    2005 Categories:
    1. Improving Transparency, Accountability, and Responsiveness in the Public Service
    2. Improving the Delivery of Public Services
    3. Application of Information and Communication Technology in Government
    2006 Categories:
    1. Improving Transparency, Accountability, and Responsiveness in the Public Service
    2. Improving the Delivery of Public Services
    3. Application of Information and Communication Technology in Government
    4. Special Award in Innovation
    2007 & 2008 Categories:
    1. Improving Transparency, Accountability, and Responsiveness in the Public Service
    2. Improving the Delivery of Public Services
    3. Fostering Participation in Policy-making Decisions through Innovative Mechanisms
    2009 & 2010 Categories:
    1. Improving Transparency, Accountability, and Responsiveness in the Public Service
    2. Improving the Delivery of Public Services
    3. Fostering Participation in Policy-making Decisions through Innovative Mechanisms
    4. Advancing Knowledge Management in Government.
    2011 Categories:
    1. Preventing and Combating Corruption in the Public Service
    2. Improving the Delivery of Public Service
    3. Fostering participation in policy-making decisions through innovative mechanisms
    4. Advancing Knowledge Management in Government
    5. Promoting Gender-Responsive Delivery of Public Services

  • Life is a lot of work. What is it that gives us the strength to continue when we are tired and burned out? Sometimes an inspirational idea can help us renew ourselves and be filled with strength to fulfill our life's purpose. Inspiration comes in many forms. However, the root of all inspiration is the idea that our lives are meaningful. Inspiration is knowing that what I do matters deeply to the universe. When you have the feeling that your actions are meaningful, you will become filled with strength and vigor to fulfill your life's purpose.

Activity Photo

Comments

The Visitors says